Tuesday, January 17, 2006

Odd Hero

While the transformative social movement of Latin America is referred to by many as the Bolivarian revolution,according to Edwin Williamsons’ History of Latin America, its namesake Simon Bolivar was not necessarily interested in the kind of “peoples struggle” which characterizes the political forms seen today. It is true that Simon Bolivar fought a great “war to the death” against the great occupying power of early nineteenth century Spain and that it is this same anti-imperialist spirit which animates today’s revolution, but that is as far as the analogy holds. In every other way Bolivar seems an unlikely symbolic hero.
His effort was sustained and encountered many setbacks. In his first attempt at revolt, a congress declared independence under his leadership in 1811. This new government did little to reach out to non-whites, slavery was retained, only property owners had a say and soon the “pardos” joined the royalists and ended the insurrection. Reaching Caracas with a rebel force for a second attempt in August 1813, he “declared a second republic and assumed the functions of a military dictator, “having become disenchanted with democratic assemblies.” Again the mass of blacks, Indians, and half-castes were disenfranchised, Spain was back in control two years later and Bolivar escaped for the second time.
Bolivar became convinced “that unqualified electoral democracy would lead to catastrophe in society” and he invited Great Britain to become a tutor and protector of the nations freed from Spain.
The third time was a charm and in1819 he again entered New Granada (Venezuela) and began a three-year campaign. Having learned from the past, he this time incorporated blacks, Indians and llaneros but his new constitution proposed a “strong executive president, a parliament of two chambers, one elected, one a hereditary senate and as a further check on the evils of unlimited democracy, a ‘moral power’ formed by an unelected body of notable citizens”. Fortunately the congress rejected both the hereditary senate and the ‘moral power’ but he revived these ideas again in 1826 for the constitution he devised for Bolivia. Here he proposed “a president who would serve for life and who would appoint his own successor”. Bolivar’s aim was, in his own words, to avoid elections “which are the greatest scourge of republics and produce only anarchy.” He died a disillusioned man, observing shortly before his death: “America is ungovernable. Those who have served the revolution have ploughed the sea”.

Fortunately the revolution of today, which bears his name, has abandoned Bolivar’s liberal- bourgeois philosophy and embraced the idea of endogenous development through a unique, regionally inspired socialism. Still, the peoples of Latin America and the movements they have formed are as firmly opposed to advances on their sovereignty and self-determination as was Simon Bolivar. It is just that today the empire has taken on the new form of neo-liberal capitalism. I am looking into other sources to see how accurate this portrayal may be, but Latin America is a land of odd paradox and contradiction. Bolivar seems to embody that spitit.

Post script: I had the great and fortunate opportunity to visit Venezuela last winter and I took with me Gabriel Marquez's wonderful A General in his Labyrinth, the story of the last days of Simon Bolivar. He adds his own overlay of tragic heroism to this enigmatic figure which looms so large in the venezuelan imagination.


Blogger answer-man said...

Hello just stopped by to view your blog and to let all interested know I am offering free plumbing repair information and safety tips for California residents and all others interested. If you are not interested then please excuse us and please disregard this comment.

For Plumbing Press Release and Free Plumbing Repair Information please feel free and stop by and read and take advantage of our blog info or viist **A-Affordableplumbing.Com** Thank you and have a great day.

6:43 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

hi there..firstly..thats a nice name - troutsky :)

I want to visit venezuela too, and see it with me own eyes. the general in his labyrinth s great too

3:59 PM  
Blogger GraemeAnfinson said...

Interesting. I don't know much about Bolivar.

12:02 PM  
Blogger CSC said...

He (Bolivar) was a bourgeois liberal of a previous century, so none of this should really surprise anyone. Most of the misleaders that have come to power recently are bourgeois liberals of a new century (democratic socialists at best).

That doesn't mean we should write Bolivar off. He was, in his time, a revolutionary, along the lines of people like Ben Franklin, who too had their own contradictions.

I'm not aware that many leaders in Latin America refer to the recent elections as a part of the "Bolivarian Revolution." As far as I know, only Correa and Chavez have called it that.

A more accurate face for a genuine anti-imperialist, socialist movement in Latin America would be Jose Marti, who fought for the same united Latin America, but who was more anti-imperialist and socialistic (though what Marx called "bourgeois socialist").

That's my two cents.

8:43 PM  
Blogger clash said...

Dont know much about bolivar; but have been hearing about him and jose marti. Latin america seem to be this magical realism struck land! :)

8:48 PM  
Blogger alex said...


5:40 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

President for Life Hugo Chavez must be duly proud, to succeed in fulfilling Simon's dream, a lifetime dictatorship, just like Fidel, Lenin, and Stalin!

1:33 PM  
Blogger Brown John said...

Hello. This little HEADCOFFIN has been delivered to you courtesy of John Brown at
Savage Injustice
. If you think that you have received this message as the result of some error, you are mistaken. Spam other people's blogs with personal insults and racial epitaphs and you get to experience reciprocity of fate. If you believe that you should not be the recipient of this demonstration of savage/ social justice, please feel free to contact john via e-mail at this ISP: savagejustice@riseup.net and convince him to be more civil in the future.

3:07 PM  
Blogger Dave Marlow said...

While perhaps Bolivar was not the populist revolutionary he is remembered as now (Lenin has had similar treatment, not only by the Russians but by socialists abroad), its important to remember that liberal democracy in conjunction with capitalism is a necessary antecedent to a worker's movement. Granted, Bolivar was before Marx came to any prominence but I feel he did played a revolutionary part.

2:04 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

i spent 4 years living in Guatemala in the late 90's, arriving shortly after the peace accords were finally signed (though never settled). i could write reams (most of which would bore you to tears) regarding rampant political excess when funded and backed by a capitalist gov't (the US of course) ...

as well as the difficulties of overcoming centuries of a social caste system, and the still active cultural myths of the Mayan people which crash splinteringly into 'modernity'....

11:27 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home